Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Facial Plastic Surgery ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.Clin Orthod Res. 1999; 2: 49-52
- Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117: 575-576
- Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery.Int J Med Robot. 2007; 3: 97-110
- Soft tissue images from cephalograms compared with those from a 3D surface acquisition system.Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 58-64
- 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition.Head Face Med. 2010; 6: 18
- Completing the 3-dimensional picture.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 612-620
- Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 305-310
- The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93: 280-288
- Reproducibility of natural head position.J Dent. 1991; 19: 130-131
- Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 424-430
- Measuring adult facial morphology in three dimensions.Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 773-778
- The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005; 8: 85-90
- Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics.J Orthod. 2005; 32: 282-293
- Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6 ([discussion: 179–82]): 10-16
- Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38: 609-625
- Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6 ([discussion: 179–82]): 31-36
- Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region—an update.Int J Med Robot. 2009; 5: 366-380
- The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 298-303
- Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 728-734
- Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: a pilot study.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 248-254
- A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 297-307
- The role of cone beam CT in the evaluation and management of a family with Gardner’s syndrome.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009; 37: 461-468
- Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index.Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 435-439
- Dynamic cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontic treatment.J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43: 507-512
- A novel 3D classification system for canine impactions—the KPG index.Int J Med Robot. 2009; 5: 291-296
- Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134: 751-760
- Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 424-432
- The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 1086-1092
- Facial morphologies of an adult Egyptian population and an adult Houstonian white population compared using 3D imaging.Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 991-999
- Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 ([discussion: S56–7]): S56.e51-S56.e59
- Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 758-769
- A three dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal III patients.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 30: 305-312
- Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42: 396-404
- Anthropometry of the head and face.Raven Press, New York1994
- The proportionate template as a diagnostic aid.Am J Orthod. 1979; 75: 156-172
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
